Welcome to my blog. Enjoy a warm cup of tea and sit for a spell.

Blog Update

**Notice**
There will be extents where I may not post for a while, sometimes it's a posting slump, sometimes it's life. Eventually new content WILL be posted, I've not neglected my blog.

Sorry for any inconvenience.
Ma'iingan




Feel free to visit MYSTICAL PAGAN for interesting content.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

A "Health and a Meatless Diet" Blog Post Response

I've encountered a blog post promoting Vegetarianism. I'm not a big meat eater, but I'm not a big fan of vegetarianism either. (I'll get this out of the way. I don't like the taste of beef, therefore I only eat Chicken and some pork...there, that's out of the way)

Now, this individual...who goes by the screen name 'Harm None' (hmph...humerous name if I say so myself, yet another person taking the 'Wiccan Rede' out of context) posts an article from the "New York Times News Service" that seems to describe the effect of one's diet on good health. It asks the question" Is the human body better suited to a vegetarian diet...?"

It goes on to describe the human anatomy as not being suited for the consumption of meat. They say that the human teeth are not suited for comsumption of meat due to the lack of "sharp...teeth" (uh...do we not have canines for the very reason of consuming meat? These are pointed teeth designed to tear through meat). It goes on to describe how humans have no sharp claws and have opposible thumbs more suited for picking fruit (right, like we can't strangle an animal with our "opposible thumbs").

This entire article is one flaw after another. Due to humans having "one-twentieth" the amount of stomach acid than those of carnivores" apparently we were made only to eat plants. This is bull. The reason we have "one-twentieth" is because we're OMNIVORES...not meant to survive solely on meat as other CARNivores (nor are we meant to survive solely on plants). Apparently this author forgot to mention the apparent useless organs found in the body that were once used in the digestion of raw meat...as well as the lack of sufficient nutrients, minerals, proteins etc in plant life...it would take NUMEROUS amounts of plant life to add up to a small amount found in a piece of meat.

The main point of this "response" is really in the apparent "diseases" coming from meat eating. The problem with diseases forming in the human body is not due to the eating of meat itself...it's the amount of meat consumed. There's a reason there's this thing called the "FOOD GUIDE". It's not some pretty colors and randomly selected foods (Which includes meat). Nutritionists have studied foods to determine how much of each provides daily amounts of nutrients humans need to live healthy lives. If someone eats 5 hamburgers in one sitting, naturally that's going to be bad for their system, creating all kinds of health problems, due to the fat and salt contents, but eating one hamburger, once every, say, 2-3 weeks, is perfectly fine. Your body has the ability to process the hamburger, dispose of the waste, and you're off and running again. It's not the fact that you're eating meat that'd make you sick...it's HOW MUCH (and nutritionists have been saying this for years...it's not what you eat, it's how much).

It's completely ridiculous how vegetarians seem to think that their diet is so much better...meanwhile how many of them suffer health problems...and I'm not talking about digestive and heart wise...there are MANY vegetarians out there who suffer from (for example) Anemia...a condition of low iron in the blood which can cause lack of energy, and fatigue as minor symptoms (for more information on Anemia click link: http://www.healthscout.com/ency/68/112/main.html#SymptomsofAnemia)

I quote from iloveindia.com...meat "serves as a fabulous source of high quality proteins, which a single vegetarian food is not able to provide. It contains all the essential amino acids that the body requires"

It states that red meat has high quantities of iron..."100 grams of liver contains 6,000mcgm of iron, against 325mcgm in 100 grams of carrots". That's a difference of 5,675mcgm, and this makes my point. By eating just a small amount of meat, you're gaining much more needed minerals than you would if you were to eat the same amount of vegetables.

I'm not discounting the benefits of vegetables. Please don't get me wrong...I just see an all vegetable diet being just as unhealthy for an individual as an all meat diet. There's a reason humans eat both meat AND vegetables. To remove one from the equation, doesn't make one any more healthier.

To be a healthy person, eat your veggies, but eat your meat too...it's not what you eat that can make you sick...it's how much.


Sources
-Benefits of meat: iloveindia.com
-Original Blog post: "Health and a Meatless Diet"

No comments:

Post a Comment